An ISIL Attack On Saudi Oil Could Shake The Markets-And WHO Would THAT Benefit?

Posted: January 13, 2015 in Uncategorized

Featured image

Nick Cunningham 

January 13, 2015

Photo: David McNew/Getty Images

Oil companies have little incentive to turn off the taps, given that low oil prices are providing sharply lower revenues for them.

It makes more sense for individual companies (and countries) to continue to produce flat-out from existing production and hope for their competitors to go out of business.

What do you think?

With that mentality, oil prices could stay low for an extended period of time.

What do you think?

However, the one thing that could abruptly force oil prices up could be an unexpected geopolitical flashpoint.

Violence in Libya since December has knocked a significant portion of the country’s oil output offline.

But surprisingly, oil markets have hardly noticed.

What do you think?

Perhaps it would take a much larger threat to global oil supplies to pull oil prices up from their doldrums.

What do you think?

What if, say, Saudi Arabia were to experience a wave of violence, disrupting the notion that one of the world’s largest oil producers is safe from all the turmoil seen in neighboring countries?

This is an unlikely scenario, as the Saudi kingdom is armed to the teeth and keeps an iron grip on the nation’s security.

What do you think?

Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia is at the top of ISIL’s hit list.

The group’s leader has called Saudi Arabia “head of the snake and stronghold of disease.”

Much of that has to do with Saudi Arabia’s cooperation in combating ISIL in Iraq and Syria.

The feeling is mutual — the highest religious authority in Saudi Arabia labeled ISIL as the “greatest enemy of Islam.”What do you think?

While there has been little news about the presence of ISIL in Saudi Arabia, the militant group has conducted several attacks there over the past year.

The group released a video on December 1 depicting the murder of a Danish national, which apparently occurred inside Saudi Arabia.

What do you think?

Moreover, Sputnik News reported that ISIL launched an attack on Saudi border guards on January 5.

Three guards were killed after a militant detonated a suicide belt.

The ISIL attackers were Saudi nationals.

What do you think?

Saudi Arabia’s involvement with the military campaign in Iraq and Syria, which involves military cooperation with the United States, fuels anger among its own population.

This presents ISIL with a recruitment opportunity within Saudi borders.

What do you think?

Several thousand Saudi nationals have joined ISIL in Iraq and Syria, and the Saudi government has even resorted to implementing a “counseling and care” program for returning fighters to reintegrate them into society.

The Saudi government has stated that 12% of returning fighters have “relapsed” and returned to “terror-related activities.”

What do you think?

What if ISIL attacked energy installations?

The January 5 attack at the border was a worrying, albeit small, warning of what is possible.

As the largest exporter of crude oil in the world, an attack on oil-related facilities — even if unsuccessful — could rattle the markets.

After all, in the immediate aftermath of a failed 2006 al Qaeda attack on Saudi Arabia’s Abqaiq oil processing facility, oil prices spiked 3.4%.

What do you think?

Abqaiq is the world’s largest processing facility, and if the 2006 attack had succeeded, it could have sent oil prices to unfathomable heights.

What do you think?

The government has stepped up security over the last decade at critical energy structures and built in redundancy in order to ensure an outage won’t disrupt exports.

But the 2006 attack was not an anomaly.

In 2010, Saudi Arabia arrested 113 suspected al Qaeda suspects for planning attacks on oil installations.

What do you think?

The Saudi government has weakened al Qaeda, but ISIL presents a new threat.

In November, the leader of ISIL called for attacks on the Saudi Kingdom.

What do you think?

For now, there is no evidence that any Saudi oil production is at risk or that ISIL is even planning substantial attacks on Saudi oil fields or infrastructure.

The attacks at the borders have been narrow in scope and mostly unsuccessful.

Even if the group is considering something more ambitious, it is unlikely that Saudi Arabia would allow ISIL to succeed.

What do you think?

Moreover, low oil prices are hurting the finances of ISIL; the group gets much of its cash from smuggling and selling oil.

Reliable data is obviously hard to come by, but it is safe to assume ISIL is likely fetching less money for its contraband than in months past, lowering its ability to stage large-scale attacks in Saudi Arabia.

What do you think?

Finally, it is important to note that even if an attack somewhere around the world knocked some oil production offline, it would not affect oil prices quite as dramatically as it would have a few years ago, before the shale revolution.

There is a considerable amount of slack production that would cushion any price rise.

What do you think?

Still, should the appearance of stability in Saudi Arabia begin to crack due to an ISIL attack, that would inject a whole lot of uncertainty into the market.


1. It’s become pretty much common knowledge that IS/ISIS/ISIL is a joint creation of IDF and the US initially to bring down the Syrian Government, but generally to keep things “interesting” AND unstable in the region.
War is profitable and we’re ALL about the Petro-Dollar.

2. It was outed recently, that our V.P. “Jokin’ Joe” had a conspiratorial confab with a Saudi Prince to get them on board with flooding the oil market to drive the then $110+ per barrel prices down to where it stung our Russian counterparts.

3. The Saudis had a hidden agenda it seems. They not only stung the Russkies, but have begun unraveling our Fracking Industry…BIG TIME. The little financial miracle in the Dakotas, Wyoming and Montana is closing down rigs and laying off workers right and left. This could financially decimate the entire region.

4. SOOOOO…since we need to get those prices back up before WE’RE ruined, we need to do something radical it seems.

5. SOOOOO…If I had a well-crafted monster growing in the area with no definable purpose currently but general mayhem and mischief, AND I needed to get that “War On Terror” wagon filled up again AND I needed to further bolster the Petro-Dollar AND Fracking AND the Keystone Pipeline-why, I would have the perfect solution on tap and ready to serve the Kingdom a heaping helping of “come-uppings” ready and willing to serve.

What do YOU think?]

Read more:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s